• Home
  • About
  • Feminism
  • Philosophy
  • Discussion
  • Email

Thinking Girl

because women are people, too

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« For the Menz
guess I should acknowledge… »

Feminism Friday – anti-feminist trolling and responses to such

July 13, 2007 by thinking girl

by Thinking Girl

As you know, I’ve been getting some anti-feminist trolls around these parts. It’s been going on for some time now. First, it started as challenges to the ideas I presented in posts, mainly from men who believed in some sort of biological essentialism and felt that differences between men and women were enough to justify widespread social oppression against half the population, or from men who believe that men are oppressed by patriarchy and women are in fact privileged by femininity, or from men who are anti-choice and want to force women to continue and complete pregnancies that they do not want.

Then, I wrote about PUAs. and the heavy trolling really began. I can’t even pick out all the examples of men wanting a male perspective to be put forward, because there’s not enough of THAT enshrined in cultural discourse, from men telling women and especially feminists what to do to land a man/end women’s oppression/forget about their troubles, from men demanding to be spoonfed feminist theory, from men who think it’s really women who have the upper hand and don’t believe in women’s oppression, from men who have called me and other feminists stupid for putting forth ideas they just don’t comprehend, and so on and so on. I responded a bit to these general comments here, here, here and here.

Then came the really really bad stuff. It’s nice that the death threats against all feminists have stopped coming.

Now we’re back to the “you’re not really oppressed, you have no idea what oppression really is, you hateful feminist bitch.” And another one from the comment moderation pile that is just waiting for a lancing from me.

My blog buddy Geo wrote to me about these trolls. Geo is one of the nicest friends I’ve met on the internets. He is very compassionate, and very very wise. He is concerned that this is getting to me, and that my energies are being diverted away from A) my work and B) my well-being. I don’t disagree. He’s also concerned that responding to trolls in anger only A) adds fuel to their fire by letting them see that they’ve pissed me off, and B) alienates potential allies. I don’t disagree with that, either. I’ve been thinking about this a lot since Geo wrote to me, and here’s what I came up with.

I think the thing with trolls is that they want to get your attention, they want to make you upset, and they want to control you in some way. However, what they don’t realize is that they betray themselves in their comments. They betray just how threatened they are by what is going on with feminist work, how their paranoia plays out in a defense of their privilege and power. These guys are freaked out, scared by the shifting cultural discourse of rights for marginalized peoples. This scares them because they experience the world as basically satisfactory. They don’t really want the social order to change. They want to maintain their power structures that keep them on top, while simultaneously covering them up in libertarian rhetoric.

And so, I think it is a very good thing to expose this weakness, this fundamental weakness in the minds and hearts and ultimately in the power of these guys who troll around feminist sites leaving hateful comments – by the way, you don’t see me doing that with MRA , PUA, white supremacist sites. I also think that this doing this, exposing the weakness and hatefulness might be helpful in showing potential allies how far these people are willing to take things, and just what kind of shit we’re up against. I don’t plan on doing this a lot, but I think it might be helpful and instructive to every now and then publish one of these hateful comments, and point out its weaknesses, to build solidarity with those who are supportive of true equality. So, while I absolutely want to create a safe space here for women, feminists, feminist allies, and myself, I also do want to let folks see exactly what kind of hateful bullshit is being directed at women. By exposing this, I hope to shine a light on just how threatened these misogynists are by what we are doing, and that in itself is a positive thing.

So, in that spirit, here’s the latest bilious venom being thrown my way:

You are an idiot | IP: 124.168.75.222

You will get to 30, and realize that you “want” children, but no man will have you because of your man hating attitude, you will either have to defraud them by tricking them into getting you pregnant, (which isn’t punished as it should be because of screaming feminists like you) But you’ll claim, it’s “your” baby and it’s “your” right to have one. Or you could take the right road now, denounce the parasitic entity on our society that is feminism, and have a remote possibility of a family. Or you could get some cats.

The crazy old cat lady.

Remember, Men are not the enemy, feminist leaders are. Don’t worry, the Mens movement is getting stronger by the day, thanks to the same freedom which allows you to post this uninformed drivel, allows us to build our network.

One day you will see a million Man march, burning wallets as a symbol of the oppression Men suffer at the hands of ever demanding Women. We will demand Male birth control pills, after all it’s OUR body. We don’t have a choice to NOT become a father, yet Women at any time, even two weeks after birth can choose not to be a Mother. We want that freedom, and we will fight for it.

You keep going on doing what you’ve been doing, adding more heat to the pressure cooker of Mens rights, and when the time is right, BOOM, it will be unleashed with a fury that will make the feminist movement seem insignificant.

Dear idiot,

you’re pretty funny! boy, did that give me a chuckle.

Actually, I’m almost 31, and guess what? that ol’ biological clock STILL hasn’t kicked in. Maybe mine is broken? or maybe it’s just a social construct based on patriarchal power structures the goal of which is to oppress women to assume and enforce the idea that all women want to bear children and exist within the narrow frame of the traditional patriarchal family unit.

If no man will have me because I hate them so much, then how will I successfully trick a man into impregnating me? Ah yes, right, because women are all manipulative lying seductresses and men are ultimately uncontrollable sexual animals under women’s spell and powerless to resist their feminine wiles!

As for men not being the enemy – well, sometimes this is true! I’m happy to report that many many feminist allies are men! Men lend a unique and important voice to feminism, and I’m so glad that so many men are willing to embrace the idea of equality for all, regardless of sex and gender! Hooray for pro-feminist men!

Now, here’s the funny thing: feminist leaders are the enemy! that is hilarious! you’ve got some sense of humor, idiot. Feminist leaders have done so much for women, and continue to do so. And of course, you know this. Feminist leaders are YOUR enemy, certainly, because they have questioned your unearned privilege as a man, they have challenged existing power structures that have allowed for your success and control of society, and they have shown that the arrangement by which you gain your privilege is unfair and unjust. you, as a man, experience the world as a pretty good place, considering that pretty much every social institution caters to you and enshrines your ideas, issues, and concerns in its discourses, places you at the centre of everything, and instills privilege and power over half the human population. Of course any counter-discourse that questions and challenges this social order would be a perceived threat to you! You poor little thing – your power matrix is slipping!

so of course, the only answer is to go on the offensive. No wonder I see you here at my blog. It’s all so predictable. Sad, really. But, also, very good, because I’m sure that predictability will come in quite handy to us raging feminists. ;)

ah yes, building the Men’s Rights network. Guess what? we’re kinda doing the same thing.

oh suffer the menz, the oppression they face at the hands of women! pity! shame! It’s so funny to me that this battle cry is the central tenet of MRAs, considering how ridiculous it is to think that women, the oppressed sex class, actually has enough social power to oppress men right back! There is no such thing as reverse sexism – how could an oppressed class actually have enough social power to create vast wide-reaching social structures to oppress their oppressors? The menz as put-upon and oppressed simply doesn’t work, logically. but I’m sure that’s exactly how it must feel to you, as a threatened patriarch. sorry I don’t have much sympathy for that.

Besides, feminists don’t want to reverse the social order to make it a matriarchy. We just want our rights to be substantive and inalienable and equal and respected.

But, there is one thing you say that really REALLY cracks me up – male birth control! don’t you know how easy it is not to get a woman pregnant? it’s called abstinence, and it goes both ways my friend! Also, there’s this device that has been around for a really long time, perhaps you’ve heard of it – the condom?

Ah, but I jest. no seriously, I would love to see a male birth control pill or implant come onto the market. I think men absolutely should be asking for it! It would take the responsibility off of women to prevent pregnancy and put it on men in a more equal way. But it’s funny, the drug companies have historically focused on women’s birth control because the men who controlled them thought women should be responsible for preventing pregnancy, and that men wouldn’t actually use birth control if it were available to them. And, based on how many men I know who do everything they can to avoid using condoms, I think they might have a point.

But, it’s good to know that what I’m doing here is making a difference. Thanks for letting me know how valuable my work here is in identifying patriarchy as a primary source of gender oppression and ways we can all work to dismantle it and bring about a more just society. I know it must be hard for you and your little friends to accept that women are people too, after so many centuries of treating us like shit on your shoe. But, like I say, something we feminists are doing is working, since we’ve got you scared shitless.

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Feminism, Feminism Friday | 30 Comments

30 Responses

  1. on July 13, 2007 at 11:18 am liberallatte

    Great reply TG. History shows that pathetic reactionaries, no matter how loudly and aggressively they shout, are doomed to lose; look at slave owners and anti-suffragists… only a century ago, women could vote only in three countries. Now, suffrage has been won in most places, despite all the misogynist cries filled with anger and hatred. We, the Left, the Progressives, have always won in long-term, and I don’t see any reasons why the trend should now cease to continue.

    It is just one of their nasty and despicable strategies to exhaust you and other progressive, feminist activists so we can’t concentrate on our struggle against oppression. Ignore them. As one of the greatest feminists, Eleanor Roosevelt said, “No one can make you inferior without your consent.”


  2. on July 13, 2007 at 12:01 pm Scarred

    TG: I HAD THE SAME TROLL TOO!:)
    I ignored him initially but saved the IP address. I’m glad that I did.:) Yes, he paid a visit to my blog too.:))

    COWARD.

    This comment was issued at July 11th, 2007. The time was 11:11 pm. Same idiot, EXACT same idiot. Same IP address, same syntax, even the same opener.

    • You are an idiot | yeah@right.com | IP: 124.168.75.222
    You are an idiot, like most feminsts you do not like discussion on ANY subject that you do not like. Don’t worry, feminisms reign of terror will be over soon (80% female initiated divorce rate). Just think, you feminists have bred those PUA’s with all your bitchy, holier than thou attitudes Men hating attitudes. Men adapt, women whine, and boy have we adapted, and you hate it, just as we have hated feminism.
    You can preach all you like, the only way to fix it is to become true “women” again.

    Yes, how original. Isn’t that special? Why do I have the feeling that Red Jenny was spot on when she had the idea that there were in reality, percentage-wise, very few trollers that went after feminist sites?

    But it doesn’t matter.

    Even if we had 50 million trollers, even if we had 50 BILLION trollers, it doesn’t matter. WE’RE WINNING. THAT’S ALL THERE IS TO IT.:) This is the evidence of it–their cowardly, nasty, bullying fear.


  3. on July 13, 2007 at 12:11 pm Roy

    A woman I really respect told me once that I should know I’m doing something right when I piss off the trolls. I believe she put it something like “If what you’re saying doesn’t piss anyone off, it’s probably not something that was worth saying.” It’s a lot like what you’re saying there: they get aggressive and upset and troll because they know that what you’re saying is threatening. It’s challanging the world that they live in, and, on some level, that scares them.

    Which isn’t to say that it can’t also be upsetting and difficult for you. I know that I find comments like those really disheartening and sometimes overwhelming, but I absolutely think you’re doing great stuff here- there’s a reason that I check this site so often. Thinking, indeed.


  4. on July 13, 2007 at 12:12 pm tanglethis

    Hee hee… I can’t even get mad, because I was so distracted by the funny bit about women being controlled by a biological desire than men need to fill. Let’s set aside for the moment that not all women experience a biological clock per se. (I’ve only met two who seem to, but I’m not convinced it’s a particularly biological need.) What do you want to bet that this guy has heard, is terrified, and is hoping you haven’t heard that women might be able to make their own sperm? : D

    But male birth control pills… that sounds excellent! I must not be reading enough feminist blogs because I honestly hadn’t heard of that one before. I think science should get started on this right away, because male birth control pills will almost certainly be pharmacologically more effective than female birth control pills – I’ve always cursed the drug industry for producing fifteen different Viagra knockoffs before producing a kind of birth control that didn’t make me bleed for weeks at a time.
    The trouble is that I don’t know any man – and that includes the love of my life – that I could rely on to use oral contraceptives regularly and effectively.
    Oh well. I’ll just amuse myself by speculating on what possible side effects that hormonal contraception would produce in the Man Movement.


  5. on July 13, 2007 at 12:18 pm tanglethis

    P.S. When the Man Movement comes, it’s going to be just like the feminist movement in the 60s and 70s? Point for point? How flattering. : D


  6. on July 13, 2007 at 1:14 pm madame furie

    The threat of a male birth control cracked me up as well. I’ve been on the pill for about seven years of ups and downs, and would love to pass that responsibility off to my boyfriend for a while. And really, men can’t currently control whether or not they impregnant a woman? Has he HEARD of condoms? Too bad his father didn’t use one…

    And while I understand how tiresome it can be to deal with trolls of such caliber, I do want to thank you for so intelligently and artfully dismantling their arguments on a public forum. Reading your retorts helps me form my own when I’m confronted with trolls in real life, which happens far too often and can’t be moderated with the click of a button. Keep up the great work!


  7. on July 13, 2007 at 1:57 pm Red Jenny

    Heh. “No need for condoms. Don’t worry, baby, I’m on the pill.”


  8. on July 13, 2007 at 3:13 pm sassywho

    great response, i know you are not supposed to feed the trolls, but good mockery should never be slighted.

    plus, for all of the other feminist bloggers who deal with them, it’s nice to know you aren’t the only one.


  9. on July 13, 2007 at 4:33 pm nightgigjo

    TG: Women producing sperm? Same-sex couples (at least biologically female ones) could produce their own offspring, if desired? I kind of like that idea.

    tanglethis: p.p.s.: Yes, except they’ll burn jock straps?


  10. on July 13, 2007 at 7:22 pm Laur

    I don’t know if you’ve heard of Prussian Blue, but they’re a white nationalist singing duo who praise Nazis in their songs, and I once wrote a blog about how I disagree with their views, their music, and find the message they’re spreading disgusting. I linked to their website, and the admins of their forum found my site in their referrals, sparking a few threads dedicated to me and then a hell of a lot of nasty comments from their white nationalist supporters. The arguing and fighting went on for a while, and there is still one fan of theirs who frequents my website and makes sure to voice his opinions whenever I talk about diversity, racism, sexism, or homophobia, offering a… different perspective on it. Basically, he turns every issue I bring up into an example of how white people are really the ones being oppressed. If it weren’t so disturbing, it’d be funny.

    The point is, once I stopped responding to them, they quieted down (for the most part). The best thing you can do is ignore these idiots, as hard as it is not to respond. The more let them anger you, the more they’ll keep coming to try to push your buttons. It’s obvious enough that anyone claiming men suffer more than women because of gender oppression is a complete and total moron, so they don’t even deserve an intelligent response from you. Better not to acknowledge their idiocy at all.


  11. on July 14, 2007 at 12:12 am steve

    TG
    The only reason you get so much of this is
    Your female and thus ” presumably ” weaker.
    They get a wider audience on the internet.
    They think they are anonomous
    And sometimes they are off their meds.

    A bully always likes soft targets and an audience.

    This makes me wish for dueling to be made legal again. A pistol only needs enough strength to pull the trigger. Makes a more polite society when verbal drive bys could cost you your life.

    Then again it will probably never happen but one can wish.

    Steve


  12. on July 14, 2007 at 4:27 am Simonne

    “I do want to thank you for so intelligently and artfully dismantling their arguments on a public forum. Reading your retorts helps me form my own when I’m confronted with trolls in real life…”
    I wholeheartedly agree with this! Great response TG.


  13. on July 14, 2007 at 7:56 am wussyderder

    Great reply!
    I just wanted to say I really like what you’re doing here. I stumbled across your blog when someone linked a post of mine from here. I’m already looking forward to new posts!


  14. on July 14, 2007 at 8:23 am Scarred

    “A bully always likes soft targets and an audience.

    This makes me wish for dueling to be made legal again. A pistol only needs enough strength to pull the trigger. Makes a more polite society when verbal drive bys could cost you your life.”

    You and I think alot alike on this issue, Steve. Amen, amen.


  15. on July 14, 2007 at 10:14 am Zee

    The biggest problem I can see with ‘male birth control pills’ is that it is bound to be the responsibility of ‘their’ women to get them to take the damn thing.
    Hell, if it’s my fault he can’t find his car keys or remember to feed the fish, what hope is there for him remembering to take a flippin’ pill?


  16. on July 14, 2007 at 10:50 am ballgame

    TG: I am tremendously saddened and disappointed to be labeled an “anti-feminist troll” here, as indicated by your selection of one of my comments as illustrative of the phenomenon. I became a democratic socialist & gender egalitarian feminist in my late teens (that was a long time ago), and I remain one today.

    AFAICT, you seem to be equating “troll” with “someone who disagrees with you.” According to Wikipedia, a troll is someone who “concentrat[es] almost exclusively on facts irrelevant to the point of the conversation, with the intent of provoking a reaction from others.” That characterization doesn’t apply to any of the comments I’ve made here.

    The definition adds that an “indignant user who has had a previous normal relationship with the group is not a troll.” Almost all of the comments I made here which took issue with your POV were made prior to November of last year, and at that time you still considered my perspectives worthy enough to merit publishing a guest post from me. I certainly invite your readers to peruse that post and judge for themselves whether the POV underlying that piece is consistent with what they think of when they see the term “anti-feminist troll.”

    Since that time, it has certainly seemed to me that those aspects of your gender philosophy with which I’ve always disagreed have hardened and come to dominate your outlook. I’ve been alternately saddened and angered to see this happen. My response, however, has not been to “troll.” Indeed, as it became clear that discussions about basic gender issues was not something you valued (“this is not a Feminism 101 blog” etc.), I’ve barley posted here at all. This year, I’ve made a grand total of four comments (excluding this one), only two of which could be construed as expressing disagreement.

    I am very sorry to hear that you’ve been the recipient of hate mail and hate comments, TG. It is nonetheless personally insulting for you to lump me into the same category as these folks. I can’t help but suspect that the haters are secretly pleased when you cast allies and enemies alike into the same rhetorical bonfire.


  17. on July 14, 2007 at 9:19 pm Tom

    TG,

    A month or so ago in a comment thread at Slant Truth you mentioned something about folks coming in and getting each other’s backs when they’re attacked.

    So … looking at the remarkable comment you quoted (and the even more brazen one immediately above) … Is this one of those times?


  18. on July 14, 2007 at 9:32 pm Tom

    Wait, I think I screwed one thing up.

    For some reason I assumed that the comment in the blockquote in the post was from Ballgame. My reaction to his latest comment was partly based on that assumption. Looks like I assumed wrong about that part. My mistake.


  19. on July 15, 2007 at 12:23 am thinking girl

    thanks all.

    to those who feel it’s better to ignore trolls: this is the tactic that I have taken and usually do take. I usually do not publish the comments of these folks, although I do save them (and their email and IP addresses). I don’t like to give voice to misogyny, or hatred of any kind, really.

    But, I saw a chance to build solidarity by publishing some of their BS. I saw a gap, a space between their crumbling power matrix and our strengthening one – a Foucaldian space, in a way – a space that could be claimed, where perhaps power could flow in a different way. And so, I chose to grab it, to fill it up. To make things a bit more uncomfortable for them. I don’t think we can afford to ignore those spaces and gaps. I think when we see weakness in the dominant social order, we should stick our fingers into those holes and wiggle them around, dig at them, pry them further open and apart, and claim even more space for ourselves, claim even more and even different kinds of power in those places.

    tanglethis, nightgigjo – mmmm, women producing sperm. I likey.

    I did know that it is technically possible to clone from an egg alone, which a woman could then carry and give birth to if she so desired. It’s entirely possible to re-produce without sperm, in a sense. But produce our own sperm? even better.

    ballgame – ah yes. It’s true, I didn’t use to consider you to be a troll. not at all. I did publish a guest-post written by you here, on feminism and film, a pretty innocuous topic, really. I do recall you writing to me at the time that you didn’t think I would want to publish a post from you that debated or challenged the feminism I espouse here, so it’s not like you and I have always agreed, and you’ve always known where I stand on certain things.

    I also used to have a lot more patience for indulging and engaging in debates over the basics of feminism. I simply don’t have the patience for that kind of dialogue any longer, as I’ve seen more and more value in engaging (and arguing at times) with like-minded people and less and less value in arguing with those who can’t agree on the basic principles of feminism.

    but, you know, just as you have found the aspects of my feminism with which you disagree to have become stronger, I have also witnessed the same in you. and while you have not been participating here, I’ve been watching you, ballgame. I’ve seen the way you behave at other blogs, in other comment sections. I’m well aware of your feelings about my development here as a feminist and a writer, as you’ve commented on it in other venues. And the one-note johnny act of “poor oppressed men” that you have displayed here has been echoed and intensified in your comments.

    You’ve emailed me to try to make me feel badly about what you perceived to be a purposeful censoring of a comment you made here, which was a complete overreaction to an automated moderation mechanism. But that certainly displayed to me that you were being manipulative and trying to control the outcome of the situation. It also seemed a clear enough display of the thing you deny you have – male privilege.

    It’s unfortunate that you feel personally insulted. Perhaps it wasn’t fair of me to include your comment in my post as an example of anti-feminist trolling, considering that you’ve at least always been polite. but, you know, I’m not the only one who sees your comments on that particular thread as trollish – as I recall, another commenter identified what you were doing on that thread, making it “all about the menz”, as derailing – and derailing is certainly trollish.

    I’m afraid I don’t see you as an ally to me, ballgame. your agenda is quite different than mine. You are all about the men. I am all about the women. and when you show up here to make it known that “men are oppressed, too”, on a blog that really doesn’t have any wiggle room for that sad song and has made quite clear that is the case, well, that’s trollish. deny it all you like. Throwing some Wiki-definition of trolling at me, like it’s some kind of gospel or objective truth that I must bow down to, certainly isn’t going to make your case any stronger. Thanks, but I’ll use my own rules on what is or isn’t trolling, rather than Wikipedia’s.

    As for labelling anyone who disagrees with me as a troll, well, that’s pretty ridiculous. Lots of people disagree with me here. But we disagree within a framework that is shared and agreed-upon. You do not participate here in this way. Still, I have not ever removed, edited, or not published one of your comments.

    tom – yes, sure. I hereby declare any post in which I quote bilious venom from a comment or email to be a call for solidarity. By all means – fire away!


  20. on July 15, 2007 at 2:03 am d

    HI,
    Just a quick response. My sperm donor and product of trickery (our offspring) have been banished from my domain for the afternoon, so not much time to relay all thoughts on this Goon.

    Love, this bloke has clearly had a woman who he shared a child with and she has been, probably, a tad unsavory about it. Not fun for anyone, neither is he funny. He’s not writing to you, or womankind, he’s writing to her. He’s clearly not such a clever fella, just an angry one (eeek, angry man, yucky) who writes in spite from personal experience. How’s his tone of retaliation? Yewie, like a kid who’s had a toy taken from him. Frankly I find his words idiotic and his tone a bit scare enducing ['BOOM' etc], cause he’s a little on the agro side of life.

    Thanks for posting this man’s point of view.

    Keep up the good work.

    D


  21. on July 15, 2007 at 10:56 am Tom

    When I read a comment like 124.168.75.222′s, it just seems so obvious who is really being controlled by a biological imperative. (Hint: four letters, starts with M, ends with Z.)


  22. on July 15, 2007 at 4:05 pm ballgame

    I also used to have a lot more patience for indulging and engaging in debates over the basics of feminism. I simply don’t have the patience for that kind of dialogue any longer…

    Though I was sorry to see your blog approach evolve this way, I have certainly respected that approach, which is why the last time I commented here (before this thread) was in March. And which is also why this comment of yours …

    [W]hen you show up here to make it known that “men are oppressed, too”, on a blog that really doesn’t have any wiggle room for that sad song and has made quite clear that is the case, well, that’s trollish.

    … is blatantly misleading. At the time I made the comment you fisked in your OP — back in October — you did not have such a policy. Indeed, in a comment on that thread just prior to the one you cited, I said …

    That, of course, does not include many major items that could be written under the aegis of “feminine privilege.” I came up with 17, which I was going to post but that would make this comment extremely long and I didn’t want to be rude. But if you’re curious, I’ll post (it’s a little under 400 words).

    … and you responded …

    yes, please, I’m interested to hear what you would think feminine privileges are.

    It is also distressing for me to now read:

    You’ve emailed me to try to make me feel badly about what you perceived to be a purposeful censoring of a comment you made here, which was a complete overreaction to an automated moderation mechanism. But that certainly displayed to me that you were being manipulative and trying to control the outcome of the situation. It also seemed a clear enough display of the thing you deny you have – male privilege.

    I did not email you to try to make you ‘feel bad’, and you certainly didn’t seem to think so at the time. In fact, I specifically said I thought the issue was an email address issue but that I wasn’t sure if I was considered at that point to be an MRA. In your email response, you thanked me for my original query and said you did not think of me as an MRA and that you didn’t think we were that far apart in terms of our political ideals. You also thanked me for my having been mindful of when not to comment. Indeed, you later criticized Disgusted Beyond Belief for failing to email you about a moderated comment “as Ballgame did once.”

    In short, I certainly get that you do not value my input now on issues of gender, but that’s why I haven’t commented here since March. I think it’s unfair of you to paint me now as some sort of troll for dialog you welcomed in the past.


  23. on July 17, 2007 at 2:29 pm thinking girl

    ah yes, poor persecuted ballgame. I don’t really feel my approach has changed all that much, actually. I’ve just become a lot less tolerant of this sort of thing. As you recall, I tore your comments on “feminine privilege” to shreds; and yes, indeed, I was interested to see what they were, because I was so naive as to think that it was completely obvious that there was no such thing. I’ve become a lot less tolerant, and quite frankly, a lot less traditionally-femininely-polite about these issues. I jsut don’t really want to waste time on these ridiculous discussions about whether or not women are ACTUALLY oppressed. whether or not I had such a policy AT THE TIME – that’s splitting hairs, ballgame, and I think you know it. In fact, comments such as yours were the reason I strengthened my comment policy.

    I don’t see you as an MRA, but I do see you as not particularly helpful to the purpose of this blog. It has become increasingly clear to me, actually since that email exchange of ours, that your agenda is more about protecting male privilege and simultaneously denying its existence. As I’ve said, I know what you’ve been up to on other threads on other blogs. perhaps that has always been your agenda – I know that what I’m doing here has always been mine, whether that’s been clear to you or not. so I don’t necessarily see our divergent paths as something new, but merely a parting of ways once we’ve gotten a clearer picture of the other’s true motives.


  24. on July 17, 2007 at 2:55 pm thinking girl

    a friend emailed me this today – a compilation of excellent articles on trolling. please do go and visit, and check each of the links, because they’re great.


  25. on July 22, 2007 at 4:42 pm waswisgirl

    TG
    I regularly participate in the Gender and Women’s Studies forum in Yahoo Answers, and was looking for articles about trolling, since the anti-feminists and women-haters have been particularly active of late. I found your excellent article about anti-feminist trolling and I want to thank you for writing it, it has reassured me, since it can be extremely ugly dealing with trolls.

    A group of us have tried to create a separate Yahoo feminist group a couple of times to get away from the trolls, and they twice “infiltrated” the group, used personal information about us from the group(such as our emails, real names, and personal information that we shared with each other) in Yahoo Answers to harass and stalk us. A couple of the trolls actually have threatened some of us with violence in the Yahoo Answers forum itself. Yahoo Answers have done better at deleting troll questions and answers, but the trolls create multiple accounts and flood the forum with dozens of stupid, insulting, or hateful questions.

    Thanks for you list of links about trolling, I actually had found one of them right before finding your wonderful blog, the “Searching for Safety Online: Managing “Trolling” in a Feminist Forum” article, and had posted it’s link as a question in our forum, asking other feminists if we could use some of the article’s suggestions in our forum. I’ll check out your other links as well, I’ve bookmarked all of them!

    FYI, for those that may have missed the links, here’s the link to the article I just referred to:
    http://rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/CSI/WP/WP02-03B.html


  26. on July 25, 2007 at 8:07 am HommeImpossible

    TG, I have to entirely agree with you when you claim that these ‘trolls’ are indeed merely fearful of a change in the social order, that in fact, they are complacent in their unwavering belief in the plenitude of a stagnant society.

    However, I also do believe that the male/female dichotomy is not possible to entirely eradicate, and there are bound to be limits to how many differences that can be breached and how deep the understanding between both genders. Hence, a feminist vocally proclaiming equal rights (and it must be admitted that most do it rather vehemently and with much aggression) will tend to put men on the defensive. A majority of men are in fact subconsciously insecure about their social roles and the measure of their authority. Therefore, it is understandable how many of them are inclined to blame feminist leaders. Not to mention the fact that some feminists have a tendency to bring their beliefs to an extreme and extremity is something which is irreconcilable. Yet, in actual fact, many feminists are not advocating ‘hate’ but ‘equality’, but men tend to generalize and view these theory as a threat.

    Unfortunate as it is, for if these men are able to accept the idea of a more equal society, they will be able to perceive how the feminist leaders have done so much for the women across the globe. I think that this inability to accept stems from personal insecurity of men.

    Anyway, the idea of birth control for men sounds fantastic. It’s about time they start getting worried about planting their seeds all over. I for sure know that I’m getting tired of this responsibility.


  27. on July 31, 2007 at 1:22 am defenestrated

    Oh, how I wish being a feminist were enough to get either the internet or the “real life” trolls to stay away. I’ve even tried just saying “I hate men,” and I still get the question – “So does that mean you’re taken?” I can’t even get away with pretending to be a lesbian anymore – so ridiculous has this supposed “Lonely Menz Movement” become.

    In all honesty, I think that the blogname “Feminist Critics” itself is pretty much synonymous with “human troll.” I mean, why start a whole damn blog about how sad and lonely you are unless it’s your own damn issue, mens?

    (I’m so very tempted to link back to either the Alas Nice Guy™ thread or your biglongass PUA thread, TG…but I’ll refrain just this once! Thank you for posting on this, in short.)


  28. on July 31, 2007 at 5:28 pm FemSoc66

    I also applaud and admire this response, TG. I think I’ve read it through about four times now. I usually don’t have the patience or articulation skills to deal with these types of guys on or offline, but you’ve inspired me to make more of an effort.
    I guess if we do challenge the patriarchy every time we find it in our faces then it has to help in the long run.

    Defenestrated: ” I can’t even get away with saying I’m a lesbian any more”.

    I’m bisexual, and in my own experience, men can’t seem to get their heads around the fact that if I’m involved with a woman, then they’re not still included in some way. Because in their own minds, it’s still all about them! We’re only doing it to cater to their little fantasy.
    Argh!


  29. on October 8, 2007 at 3:01 am The Keeping and Feeding of Trolls (or not) « Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog

    [...] Girl: Feminism Friday – anti-feminist trolling and responses to such Ladyfest Romania: Dealing with Trolls (a round-up of links about coping with deliberate [...]


  30. on February 28, 2009 at 11:12 pm Da

    From what little I know about Mens Rights Activism, a lot of the social institutions it rails against seem to be rooted in benevolent sexism toward women: i.e. considering them too weak to take care of themselves. With that in mind, I’m surprised there isn’t more of an overlap between FRAs and MRAs.

    Oh wait, maybe it’s because of stupid assholes like this guy. It’s hard to stand shoulder to shoulder with someone who’s dragging their knuckles.



Comments are closed.

  • PLEASE NOTE: THIS BLOG IS NO LONGER ACTIVE

  • Categories

    • Abortion
    • Administrative
    • Blogosphere
    • Capitalism
    • Carnivals
    • Controversial Commentary
    • Distractions
    • Domestic Feminist
    • Environment
    • Existential Crises & Epiphanies
    • Feminism
    • Feminism Friday
    • Gender
    • Guest Blogger Post
    • Help Needed
    • Homophobia
    • Kismet and Karma
    • Life of a Student
    • Linkup Love
    • Nothing of Import
    • Personal Musings
    • Philosophical Meandering
    • Political Prattling
    • Poverty
    • Race Relations
    • Random Ramblings
    • Rape
    • Reading Material
    • Religion
    • Sexuality
    • Sheer Entertainment
    • Tags
    • Uncategorized
    • Vegetarianism
    • Violence Against Women
  • Top Posts

    • Feminism Friday - Intersectional Identity
    • hate speech vs. freedom of expression
    • professional pick-up artists run woman-tricking business to help guys get laid
    • Feminism Friday - Women in the Bible
    • Feminism Friday - False Consciousness
    • Philosophy
    • can we love anyone?
    • Feminism Friday - Power/Powerlessness
    • Feminism Friday - Sexual Freedom
    • Feminism Friday - Not a Love Story
  • Archives

    • March 2008
    • January 2008
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
  • Blog Stats

    • 333,404 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: